December 14, 2017
Last year, the eight hundred years since papal confirmation of the new order took place and here at Dominican Publications we wanted to also mark the event. We invited each of the brothers in our houses and priories in Ireland, and those working abroad; to every member of their Lay Dominican Chapter; each sister in the Cabra Congregation, whether at home or abroad, and to each and every contemplative nun in the monastery in Drogheda to choose a text (or object of art or piece of music) from a Dominican author or artist of any period in our history and, tell us how this text had inspired them.
Here are some of the writings that we received:
By Liam G Walsh, O.P
This doctrine is wisdom above all human wisdom … he who considers absolutely the highest cause of the whole universe, namely God, is most of all called wise. Hence wisdom is said to be the knowledge of divine things, as Augustine says (De Trin. xii, 14). But sacred doctrine essentially treats of God viewed as the highest cause - not only so far as He can be known through creatures just as philosophers knew Him—"That which is known of God is manifest in them" (Rom 1:19)—but also as far as He is known to Himself alone and revealed to others (quantum ad id quod notum est sibi soli de seipso, et aliis per revelationem communicatum). Hence sacred doctrine is especially called wisdom.
St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Ia, q.1, a.7
The first word from chapter one of the book that lodged in my memory and imagination was sapientia, wisdom. William went on about it at length – how precious a starting point it was for Thomas, and for the whole Dominican tradition; how it invited us to see the doing of theology as the search for Wisdom.
William himself was a memorable model of that way of doing theology. When we came to reading the Summa Theologiae, wisdom, sapientia was there again in the very first question. Article 7, quoted above, establishes that theology is Wisdom. In reading it in Latin a little phrase from it lodged in my memory, and has been a headline in my theological search for Wisdom ever since. In Latin the phrase has a lovely bit of alliteration, which has made it attractive and easy to remember: the repeated “s” in sibi soli de seipso caught my fancy. To be told that doing theology was to be sharing in the very knowing that God, and God alone, enjoys of Godself was mind-blowing; and to be told that one was going to be part of the process of revelation in which God communicates this intimate self-knowledge of his to others offered a profound understanding of the meaning of preaching – the activity towards which my doing of theology was being directed. That way of thinking about theology soon became wedded to the understanding of Dominican spirituality that I had imbibed from my novice master, fr Anselm Moynihan. Anselm had written a beautiful booklet called The Presence of God. Being a Dominican, he taught us, was to live in the presence of God. He spelled this out for us, as he had done in his book, along the lines that Thomas had set in q.8 of the Prima Pars, on the presence of God. All four levels of the presence were to be delighted in, and brought together in our living of the fourth level, which is that of grace. The ‘grace presence’ is experienced in knowing and loving God. It makes one, I was learning, a partner to, a participant in quod notum est sibi soli de seipso, in God’s intimate self-knowledge. And in that contemplative participation one becomes qualified to take part in the et aliis per revelationem communicatum, in the divine communication by revelation that preaching is meant to make happen.
Many theological themes have filled out the cherished theological nugget I received from Thomas: the Trinity is the personalizing of God’s intimate self-knowing and self-loving; grace is supernatural, not just because it is relatively beyond nature but because it is God’s personal domain absolutely inaccessible to creatures except in the measure in which God chooses to communicate it; contemplation is entry into the inner life of God, not just by study and virtuous living but by the gifts of the Holy Spirit made accessible to us by Christ; the vision of God given in our resurrection to eternal life is the bringing to light of something we can have been enjoying all through life in our exercise of Faith, Hope and Charity. All happiness in heaven and on earth is knowing God quantumad id quod notum est sibi soli de seipso.
By Gabriel Harty, OP
Pious legend has it that the Mother of God came to Dominic in the forest of Bouconne, west of Toulouse, with the remedy of the Rosary:
Wonder not that until now you have had such little fruit from your labours. You have spent them on a barren soil, not yet watered with the dew of divine grace. When God willed to renew the face of the earth he began by sending down the fertilizing dew of the Angelic Salutation. Go, preach my Rosary and you will obtain an abundant harvest.
The Dominican Rosary was born into a barren land. The puritanical Cathars were preaching a divided humanity, with flesh warring against spirit, with women downgraded and life itself despised. Dominic’s answer came in the proclamation of the Word made flesh and born of woman. ‘Hail... the Lord is with you... you will conceive in your womb, and bear a son.’
Whatever critical historians may have to say about the legend of the Rosary, it bears witness to the charismatic gift entrusted by the Church to the Order of Preachers, a gift we exercise by reason of profession, by our legislation and by the constant exhortation of the See of Rome.
‘Go preach’ – that is the Dominican tradition of the Rosary. Dominic is above all the Man of the Book. Art may show him without the beads, but never without the Scriptures. The well-known fresco ofCristo deriso, (Christ mocked) in Florence’s San Marco contains the three elements of the Dominican Rosary. Firstly, Jesus seated on a throne, the centre of our contemplation and of our preaching. Secondly, Mary, at the foot of the throne pondering these things in her heart. Thirdly, inviting Dominic on the other side to keep her company. The Rosary is not so much a prayer to Mary as a keeping her company as we meditate on the mysteries of her Son.
The Gospel of the Votive Mass of the Rosary, which appeared in the old Dominican missal, is not the modern one of Gabriel and the baby to be born. It is that of the Sower and the seed, which ends with the challenge: To you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom. It points to the Rosary as our particular method of preaching.
In the golden age of the Rosary, it was common practice to open up any detail of the lives of Jesus and Mary to this preaching of the mysteries of the Kingdom. Huge volumes are to be found in the Santa Maria Novella library in Florence, on the lines of a modern Lectionary, entitled: Annualia andFestivalia, giving a whole panorama of the Gospel. A typical example is that of the woman with the issue of blood, who said: If only I can touch the tassel of his robe. The preacher would hold up the beads, saying: Here it is, touch it in faith and be healed. This would explain the old adage that has meant so much to me over the course of my ministry as a Dominican preacher: Rosarium magis est modus praedicandi quam orandi. (The Rosary is more a method of preaching than of praying.)
Gerard Norton, OP
“Now for Christian thinking in the twentieth century two slogans have been wisely adopted: aggiornamento, or keeping abreast of the times, and approfondimento, or deepening of theological thought. This double programme must be for the Bible too. Its first part can be carried out by translating into the language we use today, its second part by providing notes which are nether sectarian nor superficial.”
Alexander Jones. Editor’s foreword to The Jerusalem Bible, Darton, Longman, Todd, 1966, p. v.
From my Parents, September 1976
That is the inscription on the front of my Jerusalem Bible. I persuaded my parents to buy it for me in preparation for the noviciate, on the instructions of our novice master, Albert Leonard OP.
This Jerusalem Bible was different from the red soft covered C.T.S. one of my schooldays: in addition to the citation from the foreword given above, I read there for the first time of the work of a great Dominican school of the Bible in Jerusalem who had produced a French translation in 1956 with explanatory notes and cross references to different parts of the Bible to help the reader.
Over the years, some flaws of this English translation became evident, and a New Jerusalem Bible was produced. Perhaps regrettably, many editions of the Jerusalem Bible were produced without the notes that were such a core part of the initial drive. The notes are not just a simplification of the Biblical text. They stir us to engage with the various features of the text as Word of God and as incarnate in our history.
Whatever the flaws, this first Jerusalem Bible was a fine achievement. The layout itself, with helpful headings, and a single column per page invited me, as a reader, to engage with the text.
In that noviciate year, I became attached to that Jerusalem Bible in a way that has haunted me ever since. Today when I hear people contrasting a fruitful Lectio Divina with the aridity of scientific scripture study, I remember the vision of the Jerusalem Bible foreword. Not just that, I recall a whole tradition of Dominican study that began with the spiritual study of the voice of God in the Scriptures, but was then given the grace of science. As one writer put it, we did not spurn the meat of science for the milk of the spiritual interpretation. In case that seems a fanciful image, it is borrowed from Jordan of Saxony’s life of St Dominic.
From that initial Dominican commitment to balance the spiritual sense of scripture with the scientific one, we can trace a strong line of fruitful scientific study of the Bible to our day. For Dominicans, scholarship entails courageous fidelity to a mandate given by the Order and accepted in obedience. In our preaching and teaching over 800 years, in many countries, we have offered God’s people the meat of science with the milk of spiritual nurture. Long may that continue.
Vivian Boland, OP
Summa Theologiae Ia pars, question 43, article 5, reply to the second objection
Comments will be approved before showing up.
September 06, 2021
July 12, 2021
December 29, 2020